Russell v. Widewaters South Bay Road Associates, L. L. P.

289 A.D.2d 1025, 735 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12633
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 21, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 1025 (Russell v. Widewaters South Bay Road Associates, L. L. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Widewaters South Bay Road Associates, L. L. P., 289 A.D.2d 1025, 735 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of third-party defendant’s cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Plaintiff Dean Russell, a subcontractor, tripped over an electrical cord while working on stilts and, in doing so, “did not encounter a hazard contemplated by the statute” (Melber v 6333 Main St., 91 NY2d 759, 761). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Scudder, Burns, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mcnabb v. Oot Bros.
64 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 A.D.2d 1025, 735 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-widewaters-south-bay-road-associates-l-l-p-nyappdiv-2001.