Russell v. Whipple
2 Cow. 536
Opinion
The demurrer was noticed as frivolous, and being accordingly brought on out of its place on the calendar, the Court [537]*537thought it too plain for argument in its regular order, and ° , rendered .
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. Whipple, 2 Cow. 536 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
2 Cow. 536 (Russell v. Whipple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shimel v. Williams
136 Misc. 464 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
Stanton v. Singleton
54 P. 587 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Odell v. Clyde
23 Misc. 734 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
Schmitz v. Hawkeye Gold Mining Co.
67 N.W. 618 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1896)
Sheldon v. Heaton
34 N.Y.S. 856 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Schuttler v. King
33 P. 938 (Montana Supreme Court, 1893)
Currier v. Lockwood
40 Conn. 349 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1873)
Hook v. White
36 Cal. 299 (California Supreme Court, 1868)
Burbank v. French
12 Wis. 376 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1860)
Sackett v. Spencer
29 Barb. 180 (New York Supreme Court, 1859)
Chappell v. Bissell
10 How. Pr. 274 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)
Henry Miller, in Error v. David Austen, William S. Wilmerding, and David Austen, Jr.
54 U.S. 218 (Supreme Court, 1852)
Husbrook v. Wilder
1 Pin. 643 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1846)