Russell v. Wagner Electric Sales Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Russell v. Wagner Electric Sales Corp.

215 S.W.3d 227, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 9, 2007 WL 3442

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 2, 2007·No. No. ED 88090·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Raymond Russell (“Claimant”), appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s determination that Claimant’s workers’ compensation claim was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the Commission’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Raymond Russell (“Claimant”), appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s determination that Claimant’s workers’ compensation claim was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the Commission’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Russell v. Wagner Electric Sales Corp., 215 S.W.3d 227, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 9, 2007 WL 3442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

215 S.W.3d 227 (Russell v. Wagner Electric Sales Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.