Russell v. United States

Federal Circuit

Russell v. United States

661 F.3d 1371

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 13, 2011

Docket2010-1498

StatusUnpublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 661 F.3d 1371 (Russell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. United States, 661 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit TAYLOR RUSSELL, oN BEHALF oF H1MsELF AND ALL oTHERs s1M1LARLY sI'rUATEI), Plaintiff-Appellant, V. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. 2010-1498 Appea1 from the United States DiStrict Court for the Northern Dist1'ict of Ca1ifornia in case no. 09-CV-3239, Judge Wi]liam H. A1sup. ON MOTION ORDER Tay1or Russe11 et a1. move without opposition for a 28- day extension of time, until Nove1:nber 22, 2010, to file their opening brief and for an extension of time for the United States to file its brief. The appellants also submit- ted an amended opening brief on December 14, 2010. Upon consideration thereof,

RUSSELL V. US 2 IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motions are granted The clerk's office will dis- card the opening brief received on NoVe1nber 22, 2010 and will review the brief Eled on December 14, 2010 to deter- mine its compliance with the court's rules. The United States should calculate the due date for its brief from the date of filing of this order ‘ FOR THE COURT 1 3 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: S. Chandler Visher, Esq. FlLED A1icia Hunt’ ESq_ u.S. collin 0F APFEAl.S FOR THE FEDERAL ClRCUlT 320 am 13 2011 .|AN HBRBAL‘( CLENi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit TAYLOR RUSSELL, oN BEHALF oF H1MsELF AND ALL oTHERs s1M1LARLY sI'rUATEI), Plaintiff-Appellant, V. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. 2010-1498 Appea1 from the United States DiStrict Court for the Northern Dist1'ict of Ca1ifornia in case no. 09-CV-3239, Judge Wi]liam H. A1sup. ON MOTION ORDER Tay1or Russe11 et a1. move without opposition for a 28- day extension of time, until Nove1:nber 22, 2010, to file their opening brief and for an extension of time for the United States to file its brief. The appellants also submit- ted an amended opening brief on December 14, 2010. Upon consideration thereof,

RUSSELL V. US 2 IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motions are granted The clerk's office will dis- card the opening brief received on NoVe1nber 22, 2010 and will review the brief Eled on December 14, 2010 to deter- mine its compliance with the court's rules. The United States should calculate the due date for its brief from the date of filing of this order ‘ FOR THE COURT 1 3 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: S. Chandler Visher, Esq. FlLED A1icia Hunt’ ESq_ u.S. collin 0F APFEAl.S FOR THE FEDERAL ClRCUlT 320 am 13 2011 .|AN HBRBAL‘( CLENi

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

661 F.3d 1371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-united-states-cafc-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack