Russell v. The Tregurno

50 F. 944
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 50 F. 944 (Russell v. The Tregurno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. The Tregurno, 50 F. 944 (S.D. Fla. 1892).

Opinion

Locke, District Judge.

This vessel from Galveston, bound for Liverpool, went ashore on the Florida coast, about 25 miles to the northward of Cape Florida, on the night of the 5th of December last. She had been ashore on the Bahama banks, and thrown overboard about 2,000 bales of cotton, a lot of copper, and lost her small anchors and hawsers in getting afloat, and was leaking some when she wont ashore. She was at a. distance from any assistance, and received no aid until two of the smaller vessels reached her on the morning of the 8th. They had with them but 14 men, and went to work as soon as their assistance was accepted, getting out an anchor and heavy chain into deep water; but, before they were able to get it to the ship and make it fast, night came on, and the weather and sea became so bad they were obliged to buoy the end and leave it. That night the wind and sea were very heavy. The crew of the steamer did not consider it safe to remain on board, but went ashore onto the beach. During the night the, salvors could do nothing but remain on board. The steamer swung around onto the beach, and beat into and upon the hard rocky beach until, in the morning, but 8 feet of water was under her stern, 10 amidships, and 12 forward, and she had sprung a, leak, so that there was about as much water inside her as outside, with 6•] feet of water on the engine room. The weather continued bad, so that nothing could be done towards connecting the chain with the vessel or lightening the vessel of cargo, but tho salvors went to work breaking out cotton, and hoisting it upon the deck, so as to be ready for discharging as soon as vessels could come for it." On the 9th three more wrecking schooners arrived, and on the morning of the 10th others, so that there were an aggregate of 15 vessels, of 489 tons and nearly 200 men. Tho weather continued bad until the morning of the 10th. when they carried out a wire cable, connected it with the chain, and brought it to the windlass. In the mean time the wrecking schooner Cora had arrived with steam pumps, boilers, and other steam appliances. The steam or had no appliances by which manual labor could be 'nade available, no windlass breaks or capstan bars, and it was only when steam power could bo used that anything could be done towards heaving any strains on the anchor. The engine room and engines of the steamship were under water, and the only appliances that could be made available were those of the Cora. The salvors continued discharging cargo and pumping with their steam pumps. They had to bring the cotton to Key West, a distance of 158 miles. They got out what they could of the cargo dry, but much of it was wet. They took out in all 3,105 bales of cotton, of which 2,266 were dry, and the rest from under water. Tho weather was bad much of the time during the service, and for several days it was impossible to come to the vessel for cargo. There was no anchorage or protection for the salvors’ vessels nearer than Capo Florida, nearly 25 xnilos distant, where they had to take refuge several times. The water deepened rapidly from the beach [946]*946where the steamer was lying, and she was exposed to the full sweep and force of the sea. In order to facilitate the discharging of the vessel, the salvors landed about a, thousand bales of cotton at Cape Florida, and after the vessel had been got afloat, and brought to Key West, that was also brought and delivered to the master here. The salvors were engaged for 25 days in the service, every day of which they were at work. They say that all nights except two they worked until 12 o’clock at night, and those two nights until 10 o’clock. 1,631 bales were hoisted by hand; the rest were hoisted by the steam of their boilers. They carried out another anchor, and continued to keep their pumps going until the water was below the ship’s engines. After the libelants had been at work 13 days, the wrecking steamer J. D. Jones, sent out by those interested in the property, arrived from New York, and offered her services. The vessel had been about pumped out, and moved from her bed, and would without doubt have come off the next tide, but the libelants deemed it safe to accept all the assistance offered, so permitted the J. D. Jones to lay out another heavy anchor, and take a line' from the steamship. They also put a large steam pump from her on board the Tregumo, to be ready in event of an unexpected leak. They finally floated the Tregurno, and brought her to Key West. Upon an examination she was found not to have been materially damaged, although her bottom was somewhat dented. Many rivets were broken out, and the seams were leaking in places. The property has been appraised by appraisers appointed by the court, — the vessel at $90,000, and the cargo at $115,446.

This Was unquestionably a salvage service of considerable merit. The property was in a condition of peril; the vessel liable at any severe weather "to be so, broken and injured as to be worthless; and the cargo, even if saved from going adrift, to be so scattered along the beach as to be considered but little less than a total loss. The master was utterly powerless to relieve or assist the property in his charge, and there was no aid that could be procured, except the salvors, nearer than Norfolk or New York. The property of the salvors was exposed to dangers very much greater than of ordinary commerce and navigation. Two of their vessels, while alongside endeavoring to take cargo, were damaged by the heavy sea and bales of heavy wet cotton. The labor was s.evere, unremitting, and long continued.

The salvors were, with a few exceptions, regular licensed wrecking vessels of this district, whose duty it is at any time to go to the assistance of property in distress, and are dependent in a great degree upon earnings- from such services. They have rendered valuable aid to the property, and are entitled to a liberal compensation. In defense of the salvage claim, or in mitigation of it, it has been urged that the first set of salvors — those who first arrived — were remiss in their duty in not laying out a heavy anchor, and making the ship fast by heavy strains, to prevent her driving further ashore that night, which necessitated so much subsequent labor and damage. The salvors are bound to do, in the line of salvage service, all their powers and the means within their control can possibly enable them to do, and whenever, from lack of en.-[947]*947ergy, activity, or effort, they leave undone anything which they might have done, it will be considered in diminution of salvage; but in this case T am fully satisfied that it was not within the power of the few salvors there the first day to have connected the heavy anchor and chain which they carried out with the vessel before the weather became so bad that it was impossible. The master does not show by his testimony that it could have been done, and the statements of the salvors, and the entire circumstances at the time, satisfy me. I am also satisfied that after the first night the vessel was not driven any further ashore or aground on account of any discharging of cargo, and that there was neither loss of time nor damage to property on account of not carrying out a hawser, making fast to the cable, and heaving chains before it was done. I am therefore convinced that the salvors did as well as the means at their control would permit, and there can be no reduction from the merits of what they really did do for their inability to accomplish more.

It is also urged that several of the salving vessels while engaged in this service, and while on their way to or from Key West with cargo from this vessel, rendered aid to the steamships Erl King and Manin, which were ashore at the same time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ensign v. Dimon
75 F. 29 (N.D. California, 1895)
Gulf City Coal & Wood Co. v. Bru
68 F. 926 (Fifth Circuit, 1895)
Sweeting v. The Oxford
66 F. 584 (S.D. Florida, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 F. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-the-tregurno-flsd-1892.