Russell v. Stratton
50 A. 975, 201 Pa. 277, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 821
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1902·No. Appeal, No. 105·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
The main question in the case was-whether the property .in controversy had been abandoned by the plaintiff. This was to be determined from a consideration of the nature of the property and the conduct of the plaintiff in relation to it, and the question was essentially one of fact for the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. Stratton, 50 A. 975, 201 Pa. 277, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 821 (Pa. 1902).
50 A. 975 (Russell v. Stratton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J.W.S. Delavau, Inc. v. Eastern America Transport & Warehousing, Inc.
810 A.2d 672 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Columbus-America Discovery Group, Inc. v. Unidentified, Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing Vessel
742 F. Supp. 1327 (E.D. Virginia, 1990)
Legal Coal Co. v. G.M.P. Land Co. (In Re G.M.P. Land Co.)
33 B.R. 729 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Wetmore
447 A.2d 1012 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Steinbraker v. Crouse
182 A. 448 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1936)
Llewellyn v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.
162 A. 429 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.
143 A. 474 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Sturdevant v. Thomson
124 A. 434 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)