Russell v. Stevens

70 Miss. 685
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 70 Miss. 685 (Russell v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Stevens, 70 Miss. 685 (Mich. 1893).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the couft.

The deed of trust was not a nullity, and was properly admitted in evidence. It is sufficiently definite in description of the property, and the evidence shows that the grantor had such relation to certain land on which he raised crops in Clay county in the year 1891 (being on them and cultivating either as owner or by consent of the owner), as to authorize a mortgage of the crops, which, in these circumstances, had such potential existence as to make them a legitimate subject of sale or mortgage by the common law. Possession of land, and preparation for making a crop on it, make the crop to be grown as much a subject for sale or mortgage as the next cast of a fisherman’s net or the wool to grow on the sheep of the party.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coffey v. Land
167 So. 49 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Butler Mercantile Co. v. Cruise
166 So. 325 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Merchants' & Farmers Bank v. Byrd
97 So. 550 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1923)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.
86 Miss. 509 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Miss. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-stevens-miss-1893.