Russell v. State

91 S.W.2d 1073
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 4, 1936
DocketNo. 18084
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.W.2d 1073 (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. State, 91 S.W.2d 1073 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. The, facts heard in the trial court are not brought up for review. No complaints of the proceedings have been presented by way of bills of exception or otherwise.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.W.2d 1073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.