Russell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Russell v. State

248 S.W. 1119

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 14, 1923

DocketNo. 7439

StatusPublished

This text of 248 S.W. 1119 (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. State, 248 S.W. 1119 (Tex. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Appellants were convicted in the county court of Limestone county of exhibiting a dancing performance, and their punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and 30 days in the county jail. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The information and complaint appear to sufficiently charge the offense, and the charge of the trial court appears to be in conformity with law. Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, J.

Appellants were convicted in the county court of Limestone county of exhibiting a dancing performance, and their punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and 30 days in the county jail. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The information and complaint appear to sufficiently charge the offense, and the charge of the trial court appears to be in conformity with law. Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 S.W. 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-state-texcrimapp-1923.