Russell v. State

125 S.W. 24, 58 Tex. Crim. 187, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Tex. Crim. 500
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 1910·No. No. 390.·Published

Opinion

RAMSEY, Judge.

From a judgment of conviction on a charge of burglary had in the District Court of Montague County, on July 27 of this year, appellant appeals to this court, and seeks a reversal of such judgment of conviction.

It appears from the record that the term of court at which appellant suffered conviction adjourned on August 20, 1909. Both the statement of facts and bills of exception were filed, as same appears from the record, on November 15, 1909. We are not authorized, therefore, to consider either the statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment being good, it follows, in this state of the record, that the judgment of conviction must be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 125 S.W. 24, 58 Tex. Crim. 187, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77 (Tex. 1910).

125 S.W. 24 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.