Russell v. State

114 So. 3d 419, 2013 WL 2359474, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8583
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15904
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2013·No. No. 5D12-2158·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kary Joseph Russell was convicted of two counts of first degree murder, aggravated assault with a firearm, armed burglary of a dwelling, and kidnapping with intent to commit a felony (tampering with evidence). We reverse Russell’s kidnapping conviction, but otherwise affirm.

Although the evidence was sufficient to establish false imprisonment, we conclude that competent, substantial evidence did not exist to support the jury verdict for kidnapping with intent to tamper with evidence. On remand, pursuant to section 924.34, Florida Statutes (2009),1 the trial court is directed to enter judgment for false imprisonment, and to resentence Russell accordingly. Crain v. State, 894 So.2d 59, 76 (Fla.2004).

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 114 So. 3d 419, 2013 WL 2359474, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8583 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

114 So. 3d 419 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crain v. State
894 So. 2d 59 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)