Russell v. State
855 So. 2d 722, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15069, 2003 WL 22298995
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 2003·No. No. 3D03-207·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm based on the authority of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Montgomery v. State, 821 So.2d 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), review granted, 837 So.2d 410 (Fla.2003); and Hill v. State, 805 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 817 So.2d 847 (Fla.2002). We certify conflict with Negron v. State, 799 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); State v. Freeman, 775 So.2d 344 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), review denied, 790 So.2d 1108 (Fla.2001); and Batchelor v. State, 729 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. State, 855 So. 2d 722, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15069, 2003 WL 22298995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
855 So. 2d 722 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. State
880 So. 2d 1262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)