Russell v. State

430 So. 2d 617, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22435
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 1983·No. No. 82-1113·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for burglary, grand theft, assault, and petit theft. The court sentenced defendant to three years for burglary, three years probation for grand theft to begin upon his release from prison, and concurrent sixty day terms for the other crimes. The multiple convictions are proper, but the multiple theft sentences are not since the petit theft was a lesser included charge of the grand theft. State v. Hegstrom, 401 So.2d 1343 (Fla.1981); Ervin v. State, 419 So.2d 409 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Therefore, we vacate the sixty day sentence for petit theft. We affirm all of defendant’s convictions and the remaining sentences.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 430 So. 2d 617, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22435 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

430 So. 2d 617 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida v. Timothy W. Tuttle, Jr.
177 So. 3d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Fjord v. State
634 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
State v. Barton
523 So. 2d 152 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)