Russell v. State
252 So. 2d 403, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6020
Opinion
The only question raised on this appeal, from appellant’s conviction of assault with intent to commit a felony to wit: robbery, is the sufficiency of the proof of his intent to commit robbery. The evidence is clearly sufficient under the rule stated in Simpson v. State, 81 Fla. 292, 87 So. 920, 921 (1921).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. State, 252 So. 2d 403, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6020 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
252 So. 2d 403 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simpson v. State
87 So. 920 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)