Russell v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Del. LEXIS 128
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided October 28, 2014·No. 269, 2014·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ERIC D. RUSSELL, § § No. 269, 2014 Defendant Below- § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, STATE OF DELAWARE, § in and for Sussex County § Cr. ID 0801028059 Plaintiff Below- § Appellee. §

Submitted: September 26, 2014 Decided: October 28, 2014

Before HOLLAND, RIDGELY, and VALIHURA, Justices

ORDER

This 28th day of October 2014, after careful consideration of the parties’

briefs and the record on appeal, it is manifest that the judgment below should be

affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated May 8,

2014. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant’s third motion

for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to

overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, (Del. 2014).

Russell v. State (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.