Russell v. State
This text of Russell v. State (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ERIC D. RUSSELL, § § No. 269, 2014 Defendant Below- § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, STATE OF DELAWARE, § in and for Sussex County § Cr. ID 0801028059 Plaintiff Below- § Appellee. §
Submitted: September 26, 2014 Decided: October 28, 2014
Before HOLLAND, RIDGELY, and VALIHURA, Justices
ORDER
This 28th day of October 2014, after careful consideration of the parties’
briefs and the record on appeal, it is manifest that the judgment below should be
affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated May 8,
2014. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant’s third motion
for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to
overcome the procedural hurdles.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Russell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-state-del-2014.