Russell v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Russell v. Southern Railway Co.

182 S.E. 684, 52 Ga. App. 192, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 94

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 27, 1935

Docket25069

StatusPublished

This text of 182 S.E. 684 (Russell v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. Southern Railway Co., 182 S.E. 684, 52 Ga. App. 192, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 94 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Guerry, J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. Southern Railway Co. v. Russell, 46 Ga. App. 772 (169 S. E. 245). The evidence on the last trial did not indicate a different state of facts from that shown in the former trial and under which this court held the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. It therefore follows that the superior court did not err, on certiorari, in rendering final judgment in favor of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Maolntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guerry, J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. Southern Railway Co. v. Russell, 46 Ga. App. 772 (169 S. E. 245). The evidence on the last trial did not indicate a different state of facts from that shown in the former trial and under which this court held the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. It therefore follows that the superior court did not err, on certiorari, in rendering final judgment in favor of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Maolntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 S.E. 684, 52 Ga. App. 192, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-southern-railway-co-gactapp-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack