Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Etablissements Aeroxon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Etablissements Aeroxon

236 A.D. 738

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 738 (Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Etablissements Aeroxon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Etablissements Aeroxon, 236 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate service of summons reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the service of the summons was ineffective because appellant is a foreign corporation and is not doing business within the State of New York. (Gaboury v. Central Vermont R. Co., 250 N. Y. 233, 237.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to vacate service of summons reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the service of the summons was ineffective because appellant is a foreign corporation and is not doing business within the State of New York. (Gaboury v. Central Vermont R. Co., 250 N. Y. 233, 237.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-societe-anonyme-des-etablissements-aeroxon-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack