Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Establissements Aeroxon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Establissements Aeroxon

242 A.D. 698

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order modified so as to permit service of a supplemental answer so far as it contains the defense of the Statute of Frauds, excluding therefrom the defense of failure to arbitrate. As so modified, the order, so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs; the supplemental answer to be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified so as to permit service of a supplemental answer so far as it contains the defense of the Statute of Frauds, excluding therefrom the defense of failure to arbitrate. As so modified, the order, so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs; the supplemental answer to be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Establissements Aeroxon, 242 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 698 (Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Establissements Aeroxon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.