Russell v. Snoook
3 N.J.L. 683
Opinion
— If any thing is to be made out from this crude state of demand, it is this, that Isaac Russell bought of the plaintiff below, a stack of hay, and agreed to pay for it in shingles, but failed in payment; and that John Russell promised to pay for the hay if the plaintiff below would let Isaac Russell have it. It does not appear that the hay was delivered, hut admitting that it was, there was no joint cause of action; the demands were separate and distinct.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. Snoook, 3 N.J.L. 683 (N.J. 1810).
3 N.J.L. 683 (Russell v. Snoook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.