Russell v. Snoook

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Russell v. Snoook

3 N.J.L. 683

DecidedSeptember 15, 1810

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 683 (Russell v. Snoook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. Snoook, 3 N.J.L. 683 (N.J. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

— If any thing is to be made out from this crude state of demand, it is this, that Isaac Russell bought of the plaintiff below, a stack of hay, and agreed to pay for it in shingles, but failed in payment; and that John Russell promised to pay for the hay if the plaintiff below would let Isaac Russell have it. It does not appear that the hay was delivered, hut admitting that it was, there was no joint cause of action; the demands were separate and distinct.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

— If any thing is to be made out from this crude state of demand, it is this, that Isaac Russell bought of the plaintiff below, a stack of hay, and agreed to pay for it in shingles, but failed in payment; and that John Russell promised to pay for the hay if the plaintiff below would let Isaac Russell have it. It does not appear that the hay was delivered, hut admitting that it was, there was no joint cause of action; the demands were separate and distinct.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J.L. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-snoook-nj-1810.