Russell v. Smith
125 A. 11, 2 N.J. Misc. 577, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130
Opinion
The residence of the defendant, or his usual place of abode in this state, is the home of his parents. The testimony makes that fact reasonably clear; and henee, I conclude that their residence was his usual place of abode in this state within the meaning of the statute.
‘ The rule upon the subject, as declared by this court, is amply stated in accordance with that conclusion in Missell v. Hayes, 84 N. J. L. 196, and 85 Atl. Rep. 818.
The rule to show cause will therefore he discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. Smith, 125 A. 11, 2 N.J. Misc. 577, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130 (N.J. 1924).
125 A. 11 (Russell v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Missell v. Hayes
85 A. 818 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1913)