Russell v. Smith

125 A. 11, 2 N.J. Misc. 577, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 19, 1924
StatusPublished

This text of 125 A. 11 (Russell v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Smith, 125 A. 11, 2 N.J. Misc. 577, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130 (N.J. 1924).

Opinion

The residence of the defendant, or his usual place of abode in this state, is the home of his parents. The testimony makes that fact reasonably clear; and henee, I conclude that their residence was his usual place of abode in this state within the meaning of the statute.

‘ The rule upon the subject, as declared by this court, is amply stated in accordance with that conclusion in Missell v. Hayes, 84 N. J. L. 196, and 85 Atl. Rep. 818.

The rule to show cause will therefore he discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missell v. Hayes
85 A. 818 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A. 11, 2 N.J. Misc. 577, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-smith-nj-1924.