Russell v. Sisson

D.C. Circuit

Russell v. Sisson

4 F.2d 1014, 55 App. D.C. 401, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3165

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 6, 1925·No. Patent Appeal No. 1707·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office awarding priority of invention to the senior party, Sisson. The Patent Office, we are convinced, has reached a correct conclusion on the facts and properly applied the law. No new question being involved, we are content to rest our decision upon the reasoning of the tribunals of the Patent Office, and therefore affirm the decision from which this appeal was taken. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office awarding priority of invention to the senior party, Sisson. The Patent Office, we are convinced, has reached a correct conclusion on the facts and properly applied the law. No new question being involved, we are content to rest our decision upon the reasoning of the tribunals of the Patent Office, and therefore affirm the decision from which this appeal was taken. Affirmed.

Russell v. Sisson, 4 F.2d 1014, 55 App. D.C. 401, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3165 (D.C. Cir. 1925).

Pincite

4 F.2d 1014 (Russell v. Sisson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related