Russell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-2059V
MARY JO RUSSELL, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: January 5, 2026 v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Adam N. Muffett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
On December 13, 2024, Mary Jo Russell filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following her receipt of a meningitis vaccine administered on March 22, 2024. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On July 9, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On January 5, 2026, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $55,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $55,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
MARY JO RUSSELL,
Petitioner,
v. No. 24-2059V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,
PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1
On December 13, 2024, Mary Jo Russell (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
(“petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to
-34, as amended (“Act”). She alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following receipt of a
meningitis vaccine administered on March 22, 2024. See Petition at 1. On May 22, 2025, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report,
concluding that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA
Table injury. See ECF No. 11. On July 9, 2025, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a ruling
on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a SIRVA Table injury. See ECF
No. 13.
I. Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
$55,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
a lump sum payment, as described below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision
and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2
A lump sum payment of $55,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner, Mary Jo Russell.
Petitioner is a competent adult. Proof of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respectfully submitted,
BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General
JONATHAN D. GUYNN Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief.
2 /s/ Adam N. Muffett ADAM N. MUFFETT Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 616-2895 Email: adam.muffett@usdoj.gov
Dated: January 5, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Russell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.