Russell v. Russell

Supreme Court

Russell v. Russell

200 U.S. 613, 26 S. Ct. 755, 50 L. Ed. 620, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1503

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 15, 1906·No. No. 307·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court [614] of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 8, 1906. Decided January 15, 1906. Mr. John H. Hazelton and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellant. Mr. Walter H. Bacon and Mr. Robert H. McCarter for ap-pellees.

Per. Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Colorado Central Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Press Publishing Company v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Continental National Bank v. Buford, 191 U. S. 119; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court [614] of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 8, 1906. Decided January 15, 1906. Mr. John H. Hazelton and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellant. Mr. Walter H. Bacon and Mr. Robert H. McCarter for ap-pellees.

Per. Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Colorado Central Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Press Publishing Company v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Continental National Bank v. Buford, 191 U. S. 119; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526.

Russell v. Russell, 200 U.S. 613, 26 S. Ct. 755, 50 L. Ed. 620, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1503 (1906).

Pincite

200 U.S. 613 (Russell v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related