Russell v. Russell

200 U.S. 613, 26 S. Ct. 755, 50 L. Ed. 620, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1503
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 15, 1906
DocketNo. 307
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 U.S. 613 (Russell v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Russell, 200 U.S. 613, 26 S. Ct. 755, 50 L. Ed. 620, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1503 (1906).

Opinion

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court [614]*614of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 8, 1906. Decided January 15, 1906. Mr. John H. Hazelton and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellant. Mr. Walter H. Bacon and Mr. Robert H. McCarter for ap-pellees.

Per. Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Colorado Central Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Press Publishing Company v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Continental National Bank v. Buford, 191 U. S. 119; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lovell v. Newman & Son
227 U.S. 412 (Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 U.S. 613, 26 S. Ct. 755, 50 L. Ed. 620, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-russell-scotus-1906.