Russell v. Russell Co.

992 So. 2d 356, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15113, 2008 WL 4414239
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 2008·No. No. 3D07-2584·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State of Del. ex rel. Gebelein v. Belin, 456 So.2d 1237, 1241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); see also Bartlett v. Dumaine, 128 N.H. 497, 523 A.2d 1, 13 (1986); In Re Flagg’s Estate, 365 Pa. 82, 73 A.2d 411, 414 (1950); Estate of George S. Halas, Jr., 209 Ill.App.3d 333, 154 Ill.Dec. 170, 568 N.E.2d 170, 178 (1991); George G. Bogert, Trusts and Trustees § 343 (2d ed. rev.1993).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. Russell Co., 992 So. 2d 356, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15113, 2008 WL 4414239 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

992 So. 2d 356 (Russell v. Russell Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Del. Ex Rel. Gebelein v. Belin
456 So. 2d 1237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Flagg Estate
73 A.2d 411 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Miller v. McCaskey
568 N.E.2d 170 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1991)
Bartlett v. Dumaine
523 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1986)