Russell v. . Ritchie

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Russell v. . Ritchie

185 S.E. 638, 210 N.C. 827, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 244

DecidedMay 20, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 185 S.E. 638 (Russell v. . Ritchie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. . Ritchie, 185 S.E. 638, 210 N.C. 827, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 244 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the absence of evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that the injuries which resulted in the death of plain *828 tiff’s intestate were caused by the negligence of the defendants as alleged in the complaint, there was no error in the allowance by the trial court of defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit, at the close of the evidence for the plaintiff.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In the absence of evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that the injuries which resulted in the death of plain *828 tiff’s intestate were caused by the negligence of the defendants as alleged in the complaint, there was no error in the allowance by the trial court of defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit, at the close of the evidence for the plaintiff.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.E. 638, 210 N.C. 827, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-ritchie-nc-1936.