Russell v. Payne

Appellate Court of Illinois

Russell v. Payne

65 Ill. App. 471, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 1095

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 1, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion per Curiam.

This was a suit by appellee against appellants, the city of Kankakee and S. F. Russell, its marshal, charging them with false imprisonment'of appellee, and for arresting him for violating a city ordinance against peddling without license. Appellee recovered $100 against appellants upon which judgment was rendered. This appeal is taken and appellants have filed their briefs in compliance with its rules of this.court, but appellee has failed to comply with the rules in not filing his briefs. The judgment of the court below is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded, under rule twenty-seven of this court, for want of briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion per Curiam.

This was a suit by appellee against appellants, the city of Kankakee and S. F. Russell, its marshal, charging them with false imprisonment'of appellee, and for arresting him for violating a city ordinance against peddling without license. Appellee recovered $100 against appellants upon which judgment was rendered. This appeal is taken and appellants have filed their briefs in compliance with its rules of this.court, but appellee has failed to comply with the rules in not filing his briefs. The judgment of the court below is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded, under rule twenty-seven of this court, for want of briefs.

Russell v. Payne, 65 Ill. App. 471, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 1095 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

65 Ill. App. 471 (Russell v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related