Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.
734 A.2d 567, 248 Conn. 918, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 165
This text of 734 A.2d 567 (Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc., 734 A.2d 567, 248 Conn. 918, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 165 (Colo. 1999).
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 255 (AC 17747), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs notice of claim was insufficient to support a motion to preclude?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had failed to establish that his injury was caused by repetitive trauma/activity that arose out of and during the course of his employment?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.
748 A.2d 278 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
734 A.2d 567, 248 Conn. 918, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-mystic-seaport-museum-inc-conn-1999.