Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.

734 A.2d 567, 248 Conn. 918, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 165

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 27, 1999·No. SC 16102·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 255 (AC 17747), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[919]*919The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16102. Amy M. Stone, in support of the petition. Joseph E. Shelly, Jr., in opposition. Decided April 27, 1999

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs notice of claim was insufficient to support a motion to preclude?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had failed to establish that his injury was caused by repetitive trauma/activity that arose out of and during the course of his employment?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 255 (AC 17747), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[919]*919The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16102. Amy M. Stone, in support of the petition. Joseph E. Shelly, Jr., in opposition. Decided April 27, 1999

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs notice of claim was insufficient to support a motion to preclude?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had failed to establish that his injury was caused by repetitive trauma/activity that arose out of and during the course of his employment?”

Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc., 734 A.2d 567, 248 Conn. 918, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 165 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

734 A.2d 567 (Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related