Russell v. Moork

Appellate Court of Illinois

Russell v. Moork

107 Ill. App. 341, 1903 Ill. App. LEXIS 448

DecidedMarch 31, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 107 Ill. App. 341 (Russell v. Moork) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. Moork, 107 Ill. App. 341, 1903 Ill. App. LEXIS 448 (Ill. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

Having examined the abstract filed by appellants and considered the briefs of counsel, we are of the opinion that the conclusions of the master are sustained by the evidence and that the decree of the court dismissing the bill was properly entered.

We are also of the opinion that there is presented no sufficient reason for sustaining the cross-errors assigned upon the refusal of the court below to award damages upon the dissolution of the injunction following the dismissal of the bill.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

Having examined the abstract filed by appellants and considered the briefs of counsel, we are of the opinion that the conclusions of the master are sustained by the evidence and that the decree of the court dismissing the bill was properly entered.

We are also of the opinion that there is presented no sufficient reason for sustaining the cross-errors assigned upon the refusal of the court below to award damages upon the dissolution of the injunction following the dismissal of the bill.

The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 Ill. App. 341, 1903 Ill. App. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-moork-illappct-1903.