Russell v. McWeeny

Fourth Circuit

Russell v. McWeeny

308 F. App'x 666

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2009·No. No. 08-2265·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph R. Russell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983), and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. McWeeny, No. 4:08-cv-00063-JBF-JEB (E.D.Va. Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joseph R. Russell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983), and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. McWeeny, No. 4:08-cv-00063-JBF-JEB (E.D.Va. Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Russell v. McWeeny, 308 F. App'x 666 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

308 F. App'x 666 (Russell v. McWeeny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related