Russell v. MATTINGLY LUMBER AND MILLWORK

Missouri Court of Appeals

Russell v. MATTINGLY LUMBER AND MILLWORK

190 S.W.3d 500, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 528, 2006 WL 1071981

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 2006

DocketED 86686

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 S.W.3d 500 (Russell v. MATTINGLY LUMBER AND MILLWORK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. MATTINGLY LUMBER AND MILLWORK, 190 S.W.3d 500, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 528, 2006 WL 1071981 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Russell (“Employee”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) finding that Mattingly Lumber & Millwork (“Employer”) is not liable to Employee for any further medical treatment and that Employee suffered only a 5% permanent partial disability of his body. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI