Russell v. March & Briers
6 Ga. 491
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
The record in this case does not show that the bill of exceptions was certified and signed by the presiding Judge, within thirty days after the adjournment of the Court, or at what time it was certified and signed; nor does it appear that the bill of exceptions has ever been filedinthe Clerk’s office of the Court in which the cause was tried.
Let the writ of error be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. March & Briers, 6 Ga. 491 (Ga. 1849).
6 Ga. 491 (Russell v. March & Briers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coker v. Life & Casualty Insurance
179 S.E. 626 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Wallace v. State
84 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Bonds v. Berdett
38 S.E. 304 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Evans v. State
38 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)