Russell v. Hammock
This text of 61 S.E. 1054 (Russell v. Hammock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This court will not undertake to determine errors dependent upon the evidence, where no bona fide effort is made to prepare a proper brief of the evidence.
2. The stenographic report of the testimony adduced in the trial of a case, a large portion of which is in questions and answers, with counsel’s objections to testimony and the rulings of the court thereon included, is not such a brief of evidence as is required by law and the rules of the court. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 S.E. 1054, 4 Ga. App. 519, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-hammock-gactapp-1908.