Russell v. Hammock

61 S.E. 1054, 4 Ga. App. 519, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 461
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1908·No. 1028·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. This court will not undertake to determine errors dependent upon the evidence, where no bona fide effort is made to prepare a proper brief of the evidence.

2. The stenographic report of the testimony adduced in the trial of a case, a large portion of which is in questions and answers, with counsel’s objections to testimony and the rulings of the court thereon included, is not such a brief of evidence as is required by law and the rules of the court. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. Hammock, 61 S.E. 1054, 4 Ga. App. 519, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 461 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

61 S.E. 1054 (Russell v. Hammock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oconee Oil Refining Co. v. Planters Oil Co.
65 S.E. 144 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)