Russell v. Grinnell

105 Mass. 425
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 105 Mass. 425 (Russell v. Grinnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Grinnell, 105 Mass. 425 (Mass. 1870).

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The bequests in trust gave large discretionary power to the trustees. They might apply not only the income, but so much of the principal as they might think proper, [426]*426to the use and support of the cestui que trust, and they were not limited to any particular methods of making the application. In the exercise of a reasonable discretion they had power to terminate the trust, if they thought proper; and in the exercise of the same discretion they may continue to hold the property not yet expended. They do not seek instructions from the court as to their duty, and the plaintiffs have no right to do so.

Bill dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Street Trust Co. v. Hall
41 N.E.2d 30 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
Crawford v. Langmaid
50 N.E. 606 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Claflin v. Claflin
3 L.R.A. 370 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Cherry v. Greene
4 N.E. 257 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1886)
Broadway National Bank v. Adams
133 Mass. 170 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)
Sparhawk v. Cloon
125 Mass. 263 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)
Newhall v. Jones
117 Mass. 252 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 Mass. 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-grinnell-mass-1870.