Russell v. Gittens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russell v. Gittens

81 A.D.3d 652, 916 N.Y.S.2d 798

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 2011·Published

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 and to vacate an acknowledgment of paternity pursuant to Family Court Act § 516-a, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Dane, J.), dated April 26, 2010, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Kahlos, S.M.) dated January 21, 2010, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order dated April 26, 2010, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the petitioner’s objections on the ground that they were untimely (see Matter of Bruckstein v Bruckstein, 78 AD3d 694 [2010]; Matter of Hodges v Hodges, 40 AD3d 639 [2007]). Angiolillo, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 and to vacate an acknowledgment of paternity pursuant to Family Court Act § 516-a, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Dane, J.), dated April 26, 2010, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Kahlos, S.M.) dated January 21, 2010, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order dated April 26, 2010, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the petitioner’s objections on the ground that they were untimely (see Matter of Bruckstein v Bruckstein, 78 AD3d 694 [2010]; Matter of Hodges v Hodges, 40 AD3d 639 [2007]). Angiolillo, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Russell v. Gittens, 81 A.D.3d 652, 916 N.Y.S.2d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

81 A.D.3d 652 (Russell v. Gittens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related