Russell v. Gennari
This text of 284 F. App'x 98 (Russell v. Gennari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph Michael Russell, on behalf of his son, Benjamin F. Russell, appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. Gennari, No. 1:07-cv-00793-GBL-BRP, 2007 WL 3389998 (E.D.Va. Nov. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 F. App'x 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-gennari-ca4-2008.