Russell v. Ford

2 Cal. 86
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 2 Cal. 86 (Russell v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 (Cal. 1852).

Opinion

Justice Heydenfeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an action by one partner against his co-partners. The complaint is too defective to sustain the judgment. It asks for judgment for a particular sum, forming a part of partnership profits; and does not pray for an account of the partnership concerns, nor for a dissolution of the partnership. It is impossible that a correct decision can be attained as to the right of one partner, unless all the partnership transactions are brought before the Court and properly investigated and adjusted.

The judgment must be reversed, and the case remanded.

Thursday, February, 19.

The Court overruled a petition for a re-hearing, filed by the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg)
202 B.R. 206 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)
Mosher v. Helfend
44 P.2d 1050 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
De Rigne v. Hart
270 P. 1013 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Haynes v. Short
88 Ala. 562 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Stevens v. Baker
1 Wash. Terr. 315 (Washington Territory, 1871)
Ketchum v. Crippen
37 Cal. 223 (California Supreme Court, 1869)
Harris v. Harris
39 N.H. 45 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cal. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-ford-cal-1852.