Russell v. Ford

2 Cal. 86
California Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1852·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Justice Heydenfeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an action by one partner against his co-partners. The complaint is too defective to sustain the judgment. It asks for judgment for a particular sum, forming a part of partnership profits; and does not pray for an account of the partnership concerns, nor for a dissolution of the partnership. It is impossible that a correct decision can be attained as to the right of one partner, unless all the partnership transactions are brought before the Court and properly investigated and adjusted.

The judgment must be reversed, and the case remanded.

Thursday, February, 19.

The Court overruled a petition for a re-hearing, filed by the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 (Cal. 1852).

2 Cal. 86 (Russell v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg)
202 B.R. 206 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)
Mosher v. Helfend
44 P.2d 1050 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
De Rigne v. Hart
270 P. 1013 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Haynes v. Short
88 Ala. 562 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Stevens v. Baker
1 Wash. Terr. 315 (Washington Territory, 1871)
Ketchum v. Crippen
37 Cal. 223 (California Supreme Court, 1869)
Harris v. Harris
39 N.H. 45 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1859)