Russell v. Dunphy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Russell v. Dunphy

4 So. 3d 718, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1488, 2009 WL 439801

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 2009·No. No. 1D07-1274·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the Florida Supreme Court’s recent ruling in McNeil v. Cox, 997 So.2d 343 (Fla.2008), the circuit court’s order denying motion to refund improperly assessed filing fees entered on December 20, 2006, is hereby quashed. These proceedings are remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in accordance with the supreme court’s ruling in Cox.

WEBSTER, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the Florida Supreme Court’s recent ruling in McNeil v. Cox, 997 So.2d 343 (Fla.2008), the circuit court’s order denying motion to refund improperly assessed filing fees entered on December 20, 2006, is hereby quashed. These proceedings are remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in accordance with the supreme court’s ruling in Cox.

WEBSTER, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Russell v. Dunphy, 4 So. 3d 718, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1488, 2009 WL 439801 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

4 So. 3d 718 (Russell v. Dunphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related