Russell v. Dunphy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Russell v. Dunphy

4 So. 3d 718, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1488, 2009 WL 439801

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 24, 2009

DocketNo. 1D07-1274

StatusPublished

This text of 4 So. 3d 718 (Russell v. Dunphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. Dunphy, 4 So. 3d 718, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1488, 2009 WL 439801 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the Florida Supreme Court’s recent ruling in McNeil v. Cox, 997 So.2d 343 (Fla.2008), the circuit court’s order denying motion to refund improperly assessed filing fees entered on December 20, 2006, is hereby quashed. These proceedings are remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in accordance with the supreme court’s ruling in Cox.

WEBSTER, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the Florida Supreme Court’s recent ruling in McNeil v. Cox, 997 So.2d 343 (Fla.2008), the circuit court’s order denying motion to refund improperly assessed filing fees entered on December 20, 2006, is hereby quashed. These proceedings are remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in accordance with the supreme court’s ruling in Cox.

WEBSTER, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 So. 3d 718, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1488, 2009 WL 439801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-dunphy-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack