Russell v. Deadwood Development Co.
This text of 94 N.W. 693 (Russell v. Deadwood Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although this case was placed upon the April, 1902, calendar, and assigned for argument at that term, no abstracts or briefs have ever been filed. According to the settled practice of this court, it is presumed that there are no questions upon which a decision is desired. Benedict v. Smith 10 S. D. 35, 71 N. W. 139; Giles et al. v. Hawkeye Gold Mining Co. et al., 11 S. D. 222, 76 N. W. 928. In the absence of anything within our reach pertaining to the merits, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.W. 693, 16 S.D. 644, 1903 S.D. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-deadwood-development-co-sd-1903.