Russell v. Chittenden

82 N.W. 204, 123 Mich. 546, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 860
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 27, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 82 N.W. 204 (Russell v. Chittenden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Chittenden, 82 N.W. 204, 123 Mich. 546, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 860 (Mich. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, the owner of the government title to certain land, brought an action for trespass in cutting timber. The damage to the land is fixed by the finding at $100. Defendants justified under a tax deed.

The purported decree contains no amount, as there is no dollar mark. It is said that this question was not raised in the court below. In this counsel are mistaken. The amended findings explicitly cover the point. The case is ruled by Millard v. Truax, 99 Mich. 157 (58 N. W. 70); McKinnon v. Meston, 104 Mich. 642 (62 N. W. 1014); Case v. Skinner, 121 Mich. 206 (79 N. W. 1093).

Judgment reversed, and judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $100, with costs of both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Millard v. Truax
58 N.W. 70 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)
McKinnon v. Meston
62 N.W. 1014 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Case v. Skinner
79 N.W. 1093 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 N.W. 204, 123 Mich. 546, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-chittenden-mich-1900.