Russell v. . Campbell
17 S.E. 149, 112 N.C. 404
Opinion
: This was an appeal from the refusal of a judgment for the restitution of certain personal property. Since the appeal was taken the appellant has come into possession of the property, or its equivalent. The Court *405 will not hear a matter merely to adjudicate the costs when the subject-matter of the apppeal has been disposed of. State v. Railroad, 74 N. C., 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N. C., 93; Pritchard v. Baxter, 108 N. C., 129.
Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. . Campbell, 17 S.E. 149, 112 N.C. 404 (N.C. 1893).
17 S.E. 149 (Russell v. . Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Benvenue Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. Nash County Board of Education
170 S.E.2d 473 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1969)
Cochran v. . Rowe
36 S.E.2d 75 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
VanDyke v. Ætna Life Insurance
93 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Pearson v. Quinn
166 S.W. 746 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1914)
State v. Lambert
43 S.E. 176 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1902)
State Ex Rel. Herring v. Pugh
34 S.E. 538 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
In re Kaeppler
75 N.W. 253 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1898)
Elliott v. . Tyson
23 S.E. 102 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)