Home/Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama/Russell v. Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, P.C.

Russell v. Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, P.C.

674 So. 2d 1290, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 87, 1996 WL 19263
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, P.C.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 145 →
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 19, 1996·No. 2940374·Published

Opinion

MONROE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of October 20, 1995, [1291] 674 So.2d 1287 (Ala.1995), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, YATES, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, P.C., 674 So. 2d 1290, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 87, 1996 WL 19263 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

674 So. 2d 1290 (Russell v. Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.