Russell v. Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, P.C.

674 So. 2d 1290, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 87, 1996 WL 19263
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 19, 1996
Docket2940374
StatusPublished

This text of 674 So. 2d 1290 (Russell v. Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, P.C., 674 So. 2d 1290, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 87, 1996 WL 19263 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

MONROE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of October 20, 1995, [1291]*1291674 So.2d 1287 (Ala.1995), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, YATES, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 So. 2d 1290, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 87, 1996 WL 19263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-burnham-klinefelter-halsey-jones-cater-pc-alacivapp-1996.