Russell v. Boice Hardwood Co.

200 N.C. 210
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 27, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bee Cubiam.

The chief exception relied upon by the defendant is the instruction of the trial judge to the jury to the effect that the burden of proof on the third issue was upon the defendant. The third issue was submitted by reason of the fact that the defendant at the close of all the evidence requested permission to amend its answer so that the pleading would conform to the evidence offered at the trial. Hence the defendant was compelled to take the position that the written contract relied upon by it had been modified by a verbal agreement. Thus the burden was upon the defendant to show the modification contended for.

There are other exceptions, but none of them warrant the overthrow of the judgment.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. Boice Hardwood Co., 200 N.C. 210 (N.C. 1931).

200 N.C. 210 (Russell v. Boice Hardwood Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G. Adrian Stanley & Associates, Inc. v. Risk & Insurance Brokerage Corp.
473 S.E.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANY
182 S.E.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Electro Lift, Inc. v. Miller Equipment Co.
166 S.E.2d 454 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)