Russell v. Alvarez

California Supreme Court

Russell v. Alvarez

5 Cal. 48

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1855·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

In an action for freight money brought in the Courts of this State, it is not a. sufficient answer to set up that the vessel has been libelled, [49] for the non-delivery of freight, in the District Court of the United States; both actions may proceed at the same time Without the fear or danger of any collision or clashing of jurisdiction.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

In an action for freight money brought in the Courts of this State, it is not a. sufficient answer to set up that the vessel has been libelled, [49] for the non-delivery of freight, in the District Court of the United States; both actions may proceed at the same time Without the fear or danger of any collision or clashing of jurisdiction.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell v. Alvarez, 5 Cal. 48 (Cal. 1855).

Pincite

5 Cal. 48 (Russell v. Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related