Russell Taylor v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Russell Taylor v. United States

327 F.2d 232, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6554

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 29, 1964

Docket20249_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 327 F.2d 232 (Russell Taylor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell Taylor v. United States, 327 F.2d 232, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6554 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Taylor appeals from his conviction for the possession of 20 gallons of non-tax paid whiskey in violation of Sec. 5604(a) (1), Title 26 U.S.C.A. He asserts two points of error, (1) that the trial court permitted irrelevant, prejudicial, and unconnected evidence to be submitted to the jury; (2) that the trial court erred in admitting statements of Taylor made as a witness for the defense in a prior case that the statements were a coerced confession.

We are convinced that there was no error in admitting the complained of evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Taylor appeals from his conviction for the possession of 20 gallons of non-tax paid whiskey in violation of Sec. 5604(a) (1), Title 26 U.S.C.A. He asserts two points of error, (1) that the trial court permitted irrelevant, prejudicial, and unconnected evidence to be submitted to the jury; (2) that the trial court erred in admitting statements of Taylor made as a witness for the defense in a prior case that the statements were a coerced confession.

We are convinced that there was no error in admitting the complained of evidence.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 F.2d 232, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-taylor-v-united-states-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack