Russell Stover Harris v. Billy W. Compton
This text of 848 F.2d 191 (Russell Stover Harris v. Billy W. Compton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Russell Stover HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Billy W. COMPTON, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 87-5573.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 24, 1988.
Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge, DAVID S. PORTER, District Judge.*
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable David S. Porter, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
848 F.2d 191, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6943, 1988 WL 54054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-stover-harris-v-billy-w-compton-ca6-1988.