Russell Plastering Company v. Michigan Construction Industry Mutual Insurance Company
750 N.W.2d 211, 481 Mich. 915
This text of 750 N.W.2d 211 (Russell Plastering Company v. Michigan Construction Industry Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Russell Plastering Company v. Michigan Construction Industry Mutual Insurance Company, 750 N.W.2d 211, 481 Mich. 915 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
RUSSELL PLASTERING COMPANY, Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Chlystek & White Services, Inc. and Timothy Kuiper, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*212 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
750 N.W.2d 211, 481 Mich. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-plastering-company-v-michigan-construction-mich-2008.