Russell Plastering Co. v. Mich. Const. Industry Mut. Ins. Co.
753 N.W.2d 165, 482 Mich. 898
Opinion
RUSSELL PLASTERING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Chlystek & White Services, Inc., and Timothy Kuiper, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
The motion for immediate consideration is DENIED. On order of the Court, the *166 application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of trial court proceedings is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell Plastering Co. v. Mich. Const. Industry Mut. Ins. Co., 753 N.W.2d 165, 482 Mich. 898 (Mich. 2008).
753 N.W.2d 165 (Russell Plastering Co. v. Mich. Const. Industry Mut. Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.