Russell Plastering Co. v. Mich. Const. Industry Mut. Ins. Co.
This text of 753 N.W.2d 165 (Russell Plastering Co. v. Mich. Const. Industry Mut. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RUSSELL PLASTERING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Chlystek & White Services, Inc., and Timothy Kuiper, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
The motion for immediate consideration is DENIED. On order of the Court, the *166 application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of trial court proceedings is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
753 N.W.2d 165, 482 Mich. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-plastering-co-v-mich-const-industry-mut-in-mich-2008.