Russell Petroleum Co. v. Walker

1932 OK 677, 15 P.2d 125, 160 Okla. 156, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 713
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 11, 1932·No. 24060·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ANDBEWS, J.

This Is a companion case to No. 24059, entitled Frank Russell, Individually, and Frank Russell, Trustee, v. Paul Walker, Roy Hughes, and C. C. Childers, members of and composing the Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma, and E. G. Dahlgren, this day decided. Russell v. Walker, 160 Okla. 145, 15 P. (2d) 114.

With the exception of the name of the petitioner, the facts, 'issues, and the rule of law are the same. The decision adopted in that case is adopted as the decision in this ease.

The petition for a ■writ of prohibition is denied.

LESTER, C. J., and CULLISON, SWIN-LALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, .11., and MOORE, Special J., concur. CLARK, Y. O. J., concurs in judgment and dissents as to reasons given. RILEY, J., absent. HEPNER, J., .disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell Petroleum Co. v. Walker, 1932 OK 677, 15 P.2d 125, 160 Okla. 156, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 713 (Okla. 1932).

1932 OK 677 (Russell Petroleum Co. v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

York v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.
93 S.W.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1935)