Russell Keith Peller v. Ronald Angelone, Director

Fourth Circuit

Russell Keith Peller v. Ronald Angelone, Director

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23464, 1995 WL 379733

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 27, 1995

Docket95-6402

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Russell Keith Peller v. Ronald Angelone, Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell Keith Peller v. Ronald Angelone, Director, 59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23464, 1995 WL 379733 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Russell Keith PELLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ronald ANGELONE, Director, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-6402.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 27, 1995.

Russell Keith Peller, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Peller v. Angelone, No. CA-94-1378 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Russell Keith PELLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ronald ANGELONE, Director, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-6402.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 27, 1995.

Russell Keith Peller, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Peller v. Angelone, No. CA-94-1378 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23464, 1995 WL 379733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-keith-peller-v-ronald-angelone-director-ca4-1995.