Russell J. Berger v. Correctional Medical

17 F. App'x 503
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 2001
Docket01-1125
StatusUnpublished

This text of 17 F. App'x 503 (Russell J. Berger v. Correctional Medical) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell J. Berger v. Correctional Medical, 17 F. App'x 503 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Prisoner Russell Berger appeals the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which he had claimed medical negligence and denial of access to the courts. Upon a thorough review' of the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree with the district court that dismissal of the access-to-courts claim was proper based on absolute quasi-judicial immunity, see Martin v. Hendren, 127 F.3d 720, 721 (8th Cir.1997), and failure to state a constitutional violation. The district court also properly refused to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over the pendent negligence claim, which it dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). So that Berger may pursue whatever state law claims he might have against Vera Reynolds — against whom he asserted the denial-of-access claim for allegedly refusing to file certain papers — we modify Reynolds’s dismissal to be without prejudice also.

*504 Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court as modified. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Hendren
127 F.3d 720 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F. App'x 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-j-berger-v-correctional-medical-ca8-2001.